You get a solid idea from someone. You take it, and confirm it with your sources. It's confirmed correct. Then you publish that idea, and cite either your sources or nobody at all (rather than the someone from whom you took the idea). What are your thoughts? Is this okay? Respectful? Something else?
It’s tough to get a great read on where exactly the Utah Jazz stand.
They’ve got an undeniably talented group of youngsters who have the potential for excellence. They’re one of four teams which rank top 10 in the NBA in both offensive efficiency and defensive efficiency. And they have a top 10 NBA record.
On the other hand, they sit in the bottom half of the Western Conference playoff standings. They haven’t won a single post-season game since 2010. And they’ve been waging a losing battle against injury for years, which makes it nearly impossible to tell how well their pieces fit together or how good they can be.
The lack of clarity is becoming a serious problem for the small-market organization, as it navigates whether it’s even possible to pay its five when-healthy starters — George Hill, Rodney Hood, Gordon Hayward, Derrick Favors and Rudy Gobert – within the confines of a luxury tax threshold which they have been historically adverse to cross.
Gobert already got his big-money extension this past October – a four-year, $94 million payout that kicks in next season. His fate is secure.
Hill and Favors are each currently eligible for extensions of their own, ones that could leverage Utah’s $13.6 million of available cap space to renegotiate their current salaries as the baseline for it. But neither is likely to happen. Favors is five years younger than Hill and still very much in his prime, but he’s also under a low-value contract through next season and could be the odd man out if there is to be one. Hill is perhaps the more deserving and better long-term fit of the two, but he seems to prefer to hash things out in free agency this summer.
Hood will be eligible for an extension of his own starting this coming July, which would kick in when his rookie-scale contract expires at the end of next season. He’s a solid two-way talent. He won’t be cheap.
And then there’s Hayward, the heart and soul of the franchise, who will become a prized free agent this summer if he declines his $16.7 million player option by his June 29 deadline.
The last time Hayward hit the open market, as a restricted free agent in the summer of 2014, talks with the Jazz broke down to point where he was forced to pursue other options. Utah could have kept him off the market had they negotiated a contract extension the prior October, but Hayward was reportedly seeking a four-year deal valued at $50 million while the Jazz reportedly held firm at $48 million. The hard line ultimately proved costly.
Rather than even attempt to negotiate a new deal that could have extended as long as five years the following July, the Jazz made known its intention to match any offer sheet Hayward signed. He went on to sign a four-year, $63 million max offer sheet with the Charlotte Hornets on July 10, 2014. To make the deal particularly unpleasant for Utah, the Hornets threw in a 15 percent trade kicker and a player option on the final season. They matched anyway.
Nearly three years later, that contract sets Hayward up for one of the league’s most intriguing summer scenarios. Read more…
The NBA and the National Basketball Players Association announced last week that they have reached agreement on a new Collective Bargaining Agreement. If the deal is ratified by both sides, which is a formality, the league will be assured of labor peace for at least the next six years.
At the highest of levels, not much would change in the new deal.
The split of league-wide revenues will remain the same – the players will be virtually assured to receive a 51 percent share (as they are in the current agreement). The salary cap will be calculated the exact same way. The luxury tax will be calculated the exact same way, and teams will be penalized just as severely for crossing it.
Rather than pushing for sweeping changes, the NBA was clearly focused on one thing — stopping superstar players from leaving their teams in free agency. Since 2010, several top-tier players have left as free agents, including LeBron James and Chris Bosh (2010), Dwight Howard (2013), and Kevin Durant (2016). Carmelo Anthony (2011), Chris Paul (2011) and Kevin Love (2014) also forced trades under the threat of leaving their teams with nothing in free agency.
To stop the flow, the league created new rules that provide huge financial incentives for a select group of top-tier players to stay with their existing teams – rules with which the players (the union for whom was led by the players who would benefit the most) were more than happy to oblige. Read more…
When the NBA’s new collective bargaining agreement becomes official, benefits should abound for both players and teams. The minimum salary, rookie-scale contracts, mid-level and bi-annual exceptions, and maximum salary are all increasing, which should placate most players. Various rules will be implemented to entice players to remain with their existing teams, which should placate most teams.
But all those changes do come at a consequence – it will be more difficult for teams to rebuild through free agency, teams like the Miami Heat.
The Heat is undeniably a rebuilding team. It has built a potentially solid and youthful core for the future in guards Tyler Johnson and Josh Richardson, forward Justise Winslow, and center Hassan Whiteside. But it knows it needs a talent infusion.
The organization has maneuvered around various salary cap issues in order to maximize its free agency options in the years ahead to achieve that goal. The summer of 2017 will be a particular emphasis, with the Johnson’s contract remaining affordable for one last summer and the Heat able to begin the process of removing the salary of Chris Bosh from its cap sheet on Feb. 9, 2017.
(For full details on Bosh’s contract and its impact on the Heat’s salary cap situation, including potential cap relief and a possible return of his salary to the Heat’s cap sheet in the seasons thereafter, click this link. For a review of how situations like that of Bosh will be handed in the new CBA, see the note below this post. In my humble opinion, the new rules, which take effect on July 1, 2017, will not impact how the Heat proceeds with Bosh.)
But the new agreement, when ratified, will have several implications for the Heat in pursuit of its desired summer of 2017 rebuild. Read more…
The NBA and the National Basketball Players Association jointly announced Wednesday that they have reached a tentative deal on a new Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), pending ratification by both team owners and the league’s players.
In order to give both sides enough time to review the terms of the agreement, hash out a new CBA, and hold their respective votes to ratify it, they have agreed to extend their mutual deadline to opt out of the existing CBA from Dec. 15, 2017 to Jan. 13, 2017.
Ratification of the deal is, at this point, nothing more than a formality. In the meantime, however, a term sheet containing the key terms of the agreement has been distributed. According to that term sheet, the following changes to the current CBA will be made:
The Houston Rockets apparently never actually signed Donatas Motiejunas. But whether they did or did not sign him is irrelevant. In both cases, the Rockets could have conditioned the contract (in a case where they didn’t sign him, as a condition to offering the contract; and in a case where they did sign him, as a condition to the validity of the contract in accordance with Exhibit 6) on him passing a physical exam. The Rockets did so condition it, and Motiejunas failed. Which returned him to restricted free agency once again.
After consultation with the league office to find an amicable solution to a contentious situation, the Rockets have renounced their rights to Motiejunas, making him an unrestricted free agent. He is now free to sign with an team except the Brooklyn Nets, who are prohibited from signing or acquiring him until December 9, 2017.
The Houston Rockets and Donatas Motiejunas have agreed to a new contract. The Rockets’ first refusal exercise notice to match the offer sheet Motiejunas signed with the Brooklyn Nets has been withdrawn, and the new deal will presumably be signed shortly.
The new deal will contain the same basic structure as the offer sheet (as detailed herein), including $31 million in base salary, $4 million in likely bonuses and $2 million in unlikely bonuses. It will have a salary cap hit for this season of $9.3 million (equal to his $8.3 million base salary, plus $1 million in likely bonuses).
The primary differences between the new deal and the offer sheet will be that: (i) the guarantee on Motiejunas’ second year salary will get pushed back to July vs. March 1, and (ii) the Rockets will be able to trade Motiejunas without restrictions after the end of the season (i.e., the end of the regular season or, if he’s on the playoff roster, after the Rockets either win the title or are eliminated) vs. being restricted from trading him without his consent for one year.
The lengthy saga, however, is not quite over just yet.
The Rockets could have conditioned the new contract on Motiejunas passing a physical examination (Exhibit 6 to the Uniform Player Contract). The determination would be made in the sole discretion of a physician designated by the Rockets. The exam would need to be completed within three business days of executing the contract (which, if it were executed today, would be by next Wednesday) and the results would need to be reported to Motiejunas within six business days of executing the contract (which, if it were executed today, would be by the following Monday). If the physician appointed by the Rockets determines that Motiejunas has failed his physical, he would be returned to restricted free agency.
Whatever happens, the Nets are now officially prohibited from signing or acquiring Motiejunas for one year from the date the first refusal exercise notice was withdrawn (i.e. until December 9, 2017 or thereafter).
Donatas Motiejunas is having a tough time navigating the difficult world of restricted free agency.
There are two types of free agency in the NBA: unrestricted and restricted. Both types of free agents are free to re-sign with their prior teams. An unrestricted free agent is free to sign with any other team as well, and there’s nothing his prior team can do to stop it. A restricted free agent can also sign with any other team, but his prior team can retain him by matching the terms of that offer. This is called the “right of first refusal.”
Restricted free agency is allowed only in limited circumstances: For first-round draft picks who complete all four years of their rookie-scale contracts, and for players who have been in the league for three or fewer seasons. Only these players qualify for restricted free agency, and only if their prior teams first submit to them a “qualifying offer” at some point between the day following the completion of the NBA Finals and the subsequent June 30. A qualifying offer is a standing offer of a one-year guaranteed contract, which the player can accept at any time while it remains outstanding.
Motiejunas was the twentieth pick in the first-round of the 2011 NBA draft. After having completed the fourth and final year of his rookie-scale contract in 2015-16, the Houston Rockets tendered a $4.4 million qualifying offer on June 30, 2016. Motiejunas therefore became a restricted free agent this summer. Read more…
Update (10/22/16): The Heat has chosen to waive Briante Weber and Beno Udrih, and keep Rodney McGruder. The Heat’s backup point guard duties effectively therefore fall to Tyler Johnson.
The final 15-player roster is as follows: Goran Dragic, Tyler Johnson, Josh Richardson, Wayne Ellington, Dion Waiters, Rodney McGruder, Justise Winslow, Chris Bosh, Josh McRoberts, Derrick Williams, James Johnson, Luke Babbitt, Udonis Haslem, Hassan Whiteside and Willie Reed.
The summer of 2016 was perhaps the most polarizing and divisive in Miami Heat history.
For Pat Riley, it was largely about two things: Retaining Hassan Whiteside, and maximizing flexibility to target a whale to complement him in the future. Despite the ensuing hell-fire it would cause.
Dwyane Wade is gone, having felt disrespected by Riley for years.
He would argue that Riley’s refusal to offer one last long-term contract, one befitting the most vital player in Heat history – whose 13-year tenure spanned nearly half the team’s 28-year existence – exemplifies that disrespect. That in the wake of LeBron James leaving two summers ago, Riley clearly made retaining Chris Bosh his first priority (offering a full five-year, $119 million max contract) while leaving himself toiled with a sub-par offer for a talent of his caliber ($15 million, with a player option for a second season at $16 million). That the offer was better last summer ($20 million), but only after owner Micky Arison intervened when highly contentious negotiations with Riley had stalled and only in exchange for an even shorter term (one year). That Riley clearly made his first priority for this season to retain Whiteside, and his second priority to pursue the never realistic pipe dream that was Kevin Durant. Wade is no third option – particularly after what had happened the prior two summers, and particularly when successful pursuits of the first two would severely limit that which would be left over for the organization to compensate himself. After all, it was only Riley’s failed pursuit of Durant that made even the two years and $41 million he did offer possible. The initial offer was downright appalling (some speculating in the neighborhood of $10 million per season).
He would argue that Riley didn’t even have the decency to present that $41 million offer. That Riley never even met with him this summer. That his inaction was intentional. That every move he made this summer had an ulterior motive. That he never truly wanted Wade back.
Riley would surely object to the assertion that Wade was disrespected.
He would argue that he was eager to sign Wade (and James and Bosh) to a full max contract in the summer of 2010, which would’ve paid out an NBA-second-best $126 million over the past six years; it was Wade who chose to take less.
He would argue that he was fully prepared to honor the two years and $42 million remaining on Wade’s contract, which would’ve been sixth highest in the NBA, in the summer of 2014; it was Wade who chose to opt out.
He would argue that offering a string of shorter-term deals is not a sign of disrespect but rather a sign of compromise toward a common goal, in which the Heat could gain flexibility and Wade could benefit financially for enabling it. That these past two summers were a perfect microcosm. Wade had petitioned for a three-year deal paying out in the range of $45 million to $50 million in the summer of 2015; adding the one-year, $20 million deal he took that summer to the two years and $41 million he was offered in July totals to $61 million.
Both would be right. And both would be wrong. But did Riley truly want Wade back?
Pat Riley, in a meeting with reporters, said that Chris Bosh’s career with the Miami Heat “is probably over” and that the team is “not working toward his return.”
Bosh, an 11-time All-Star, failed his preseason physical last week. The Heat had been prepared to clear him for play, contingent on him passing. During the testing, however, doctors reportedly found continued evidence of blood clotting.
“We headed down the road very excited to a point where we thought it would work,” Riley said. “And then the physical couldn’t clear him to the next step.”
Blood clotting is a normal process that occurs in the body to prevent bleeding and promote healing after an injury. The body forms blood clots when the platelets within the blood encounter a damaged blood vessel, and then breaks them down as the damaged tissue heals.
Clots can form unexpectedly, however, without notice or purpose, and have dangerous consequences. Certain clots, such as those that start in the leg or calf (called a deep vein thrombosis, or DVT) and travel to the lungs (called a pulmonary embolism), can be fatal. And those who have endured previous clots in the past are particularly susceptible to a recurrence.
According to the NIH, more than 600,000 people in the U.S. are diagnosed with DVT each year and roughly 30 percent of those patients develop a recurrence within 10 years, with the risk being greatest in the first two years. Recurrence is more likely in those who initially presented with a pulmonary embolism as well, as did Bosh, and is more likely to be another pulmonary embolism (as opposed to a DVT alone), leaving Bosh susceptible to a potentially more serious recurrence.
That Bosh has already endured multiple blood clotting episodes and that he plays a contact sport (professional basketball), both sharply exacerbate the risk of future recurrences. The risk for Bosh is therefore very real.
Blood clots are treated with anticoagulant drugs (blood thinners), which prevent further blood clots from forming as the body’s normal systems work to break up the existing clot(s).
For those who have endured a single clotting episode, blood thinners are typically continued for up to six months. Many professional athletes who have suffered blood clots have been able to successfully resume their careers without incident after completing their initial blood-thinner regimen.
However, people who suffer multiple blood clots are at sharper risk of a recurrence, and are typically therefore recommended to remain on blood thinners for the rest of their lives.
Blood thinners greatly reduce the likelihood of future blood clots, but they can have a potentially serious side effect: bleeding.
Since blood thinners slow the clotting of blood, unwanted and sometimes dangerous bleeding can occur with the use of these medications. Although infrequent, uncontrolled bleeding caused by blood thinners can be very serious. A blow to the head, for example, can cause bleeding on the brain and kill you!
Doctors and teams are therefore hesitant to allow players on blood thinners to return to contact sports, where a potential trauma could have disastrous consequences.
The issue for Bosh, then, becomes:
If he doesn’t take blood thinning medication, he is at risk of sustaining more, potential fatal, blood clots. Playing professional basketball only exacerbates that risk.
If he takes blood thinning medication to reduce the likelihood of a future clot, playing professional basketball puts him at increased risk of sustaining a potentially fatal bleeding event. Read more…
This is a quick and dirty post, to further explain my various tweets on the subject of Yi Jianliang’s new contract with the Los Angeles Lakers. As it has nothing to do with the Miami Heat, I may ultimately choose to delete it. The figures provided in the post are as publicly reported by Eric Pincus of BasketballInsiders.
The Los Angeles Lakers signed Yi Jianlian to a fascinating contract on Monday, which can pay out anywhere between $250,000 and $8,000,000.
Yi’s contract calls for a base salary of $1,139,123 — the minimum salary for a player with five years of NBA experience — which is guaranteed for just $250,000. The partial guarantee is essentially equivalent to payment from the beginning of the season on October 25th through November 30th. If he continues to be on the roster after November 30th, he will then earn $6,701 in base salary each day thereafter through January 10th, at which point his entire $1,139,123 base salary would become fully guaranteed.
Yi’s contract also calls for three bonus payouts at $2,286,959 each, for playing in at least 20 games, 40 games, and 59 games, respectively. The 20th game can come no sooner than November 30th (at Chicago), the 40th game can come no sooner than January 6th (vs. Miami) and the 59th game can come no sooner than February 24th (at Oklahoma City).
The contract was clearly optimized not only to incentive Yi to perform, but also with potential trade implications in mind if he doesn’t.
Yi will be eligible to be traded as early as December 15th, at which point his contract will have paid out $348,438 in base salary and accrued another $2,286,959 in future bonus money if he will have played in at least 20 of his team’s then 28 games; that’s either $348,438 or $2,635,397 in total.
Yi will be eligible to be traded as late as the February 23rd NBA trade deadline(1), at which point his contract will have accrued his full $1,139,123 base salary, and accrued future bonus money of either $2,286,959 or $4,573,918 if he will have played in at least 20 or 40 of his team’s then 58 games; that’s as little as $348,438, or possibly either $3,426,082 or $5,713,041 in total.
Yi’s trade value is tied not only to how much of the bonus money he will have earned, but also to the classification of it.
There are two categories of performance bonuses: those that are classified as “likely to be achieved” and those that are classified as “unlikely to be achieved.” Only likely bonuses are charged against the salary cap. Yi’s bonuses have been classified as “likely to be achieved” (which is an interesting story in and of itself)(2). As such, his full $8,000,000 maximum potential payout will be charged against the cap for trade purposes, even if ultimately he does not earn some or any of his bonus money.
According to salary-matching trade rules, Yi’s contract can therefore potentially be used by the Lakers, on its own, to bring between $5,266,667 and $12,100,000 in salary in potential trade scenarios. More importantly, a potential trade partner could send out between $5,266,667 and $12,100,000 million in exchange for Yi’s contract on its own. And if that team were to immediately thereafter waive Yi, it would only owe the amount on his contract which has become guaranteed (i.e., excluding any as-yet unearned bonuses). That, in turn, could potentially offer substantial savings.
Below is the amount which will have become guaranteed on Yi’s contract, by day (for each day of the regular season): Read more…
Pat Riley wasn’t expecting to use the Miami Heat’s $2.898 million mid-level exception for room teams this summer.
“As far as the $2.9 million room exception, we’re going to hold on to that,” Riley said on July 16. “I don’t think we’re going use it for the rest of the summer. There isn’t anybody out there right now that I want to give it to.”
Little did he know, things would dramatically change just two days later.
There had been mutual interest between Riley and Oklahoma City Thunder free agent shooting guard Dion Waiters since the start of free agency. Any such possibilities, however, were rendered effectively meaningless by virtue the fact that he was a restricted free agent.
Waiters’ restricted free agent status caused two serious problems for Riley(1).
First, it meant that Riley would need to offer a contract that would not only be acceptable to Waiters, but also one that would be high enough such that he could be relatively certain the Thunder would not match. The Thunder, at the time, were expected to match any reasonable offer.
Second, it meant the contract would need to be for at least two seasons in length (not including any option years).
The combination made a Heat pursuit of Waiters effectively impossible. Any first-year salary that, at the start of free agency, figured to be high enough to entice the Thunder not to match would also need to contain a second-year salary high enough to destroy any of the Heat’s grand visions for the summer of 2017. The Heat has big plans for that summer. Read more…
Two months ago, the Oklahoma City Thunder were positioned to perhaps consider themselves the best team in the NBA. They had pushed the defending champion and all-time regular season winning percentage record-holding Golden State Warriors to brink of elimination in the Western Conference Finals, with a home game among three opportunities to close the deal. A single win in three chances, followed by a series win versus a Cleveland Cavaliers team against whom they were projected to be favored, and the Thunder would be NBA champions for just the second time in franchise history, and the first since 1979.
Things didn’t work out as planned.
The Warriors went on to eliminate the Thunder in seven games. A short time later, Kevin Durant went on to join the Warriors, leaving Russell Westbrook and the Thunder to pick up the pieces.
Westbrook is set to become an unrestricted free agent next summer. With the balance of power in the Western Conference dramatically shifted, if a return trip to the NBA Finals is a priority, he may not want to remain in Oklahoma City.
The concept has sparked a fire-storm of speculation about a potential trade, which would at least allow the Thunder to avoid losing two top five NBA players to free agency in the span of a single year without receiving back anything in return.
The ability of Westbrook to leave in free agency next summer, however, is just as problematic for a trade partner as it is for the Thunder. If Westbrook were to leave the following summer, the trade partner would not only lose him without receiving back anything in return but also sacrifice the assets it took to acquire him. To that end, if a trade partner is to risk the type of assets the Thunder will demand for him, it is likely to demand that Westbrook agree to an extension.
The Thunder, for their part, haven’t given up hope of retaining their star point guard either. In fact, it’s very much the opposite. They, too, are positioning to offer Westbrook an extension that would provide the certainty required to build the team’s future around him. And they could make it quite tempting. Read more…